Comparison
One Time Deposit vs Monthly Savings (Timing Comparison)
If you have money upfront, you can model it as a starting balance. If not, you can model steady contributions. Timing can affect timelines in a model, even if the total money is the same.
Published: December 22, 2025 · Updated: December 22, 2025 · By FinToolSuite Editorial
Open the calculator
Test a starting balance vs monthly savings side by side.
Open the Savings Goal Timeline CalculatorQuick answer
One time deposit: larger starting balance from day one. Monthly saving: smaller start, steady progress.
If total money is the same, results can be close, but timing can still matter in some models.
Timing details: start vs end of period.
Disclaimer
Educational purposes only; not financial advice. Examples are illustrative; outcomes aren’t guaranteed. Interest/returns vary; fees, taxes, inflation, and rules vary by country and provider.
Definitions
One time deposit (starting balance)
Money already saved and added at the start.
Monthly savings (contributions)
Money added each month over time.
Neither is “better” universally; it depends on cashflow and constraints.
Side-by-side comparison
| One time deposit | Monthly savings |
|---|---|
| Entered as starting balance | Entered as monthly contribution |
| Needs cash upfront | Fits ongoing cashflow |
| Less flexible once deployed | Easier to adjust month to month |
| Often faster start in the model | Steady pace in the model |
| Common use: inheritance, bonus | Common use: paycheck saving |
| Common mistake: double-counting the lump sum | Common mistake: forgetting timing assumption |
Illustrative example
Goal: £5,000. Timeline: 24 months (illustrative window).
- Scenario A (one time deposit): Start £2,400 upfront; monthly £0 (or smaller monthly).
- Scenario B (monthly savings): Start £0; monthly £100 for 24 months (total £2,400).
Both add up to the same total contributed. Timing differs, so modeled results can change if a rate is included. Run a 0% baseline first to see pure saving, then test an optional rate (not guaranteed).
Try both scenarios: Savings Goal Timeline Calculator.
How to model both in FinToolSuite
- Enter your goal amount.
- Scenario A: put the lump sum into “starting balance.”
- Scenario B: put the same total into “monthly contribution” (spread over time).
- Keep all other inputs identical.
- Compare time to goal and the chart. See timing details for start vs end assumptions.
More worked inputs: savings goal examples.
When each might fit
- One time deposit can be simpler if the money is already available and earmarked.
- Monthly saving can be easier if income arrives monthly and flexibility matters.
- Some people mix both: a small starting balance plus monthly contributions.
Common pitfalls
- Double counting the lump sum (as starting balance and first contribution).
- Assuming a rate is guaranteed.
- Changing multiple inputs while comparing scenarios.
- Forgetting start vs end of period timing.
FAQ
Is a lump sum better than monthly saving?
It depends on cashflow and timing. The calculator can show how each path looks.
If the total money is the same, why can results differ?
Timing changes when money is in the model, especially if a rate assumption is used.
How do I enter a lump sum in the calculator?
Enter it as the starting balance.
What if I do both (deposit + monthly)?
Combine a starting balance with monthly contributions and compare timelines.
Does contribution timing matter?
Yes, start vs end of period can shift results. See timing details.
What if I get a bonus later?
You can add it as a larger contribution or adjust the starting balance in a new scenario.
Are results guaranteed?
No. They depend on inputs and assumptions.
Where can I see more examples?
Check savings goal examples.
Run two scenarios
Run (A) starting balance and (B) monthly contributions with the same total money, then compare timing.
Open the Savings Goal Timeline Calculator